According to the American Psychological Association, Socioeconomic status encompasses the following:
According to Merriam-Webster, classism is:
As with all other types of discrimination, classism can be expressed in language and interpersonal interactions. Writing about socio-economic status in an inclusive way entails recognizing and avoiding classist beliefs and language.
Often, the language that we use when telling stories about low socio-economic status is influenced by our beliefs. Below are some misconceptions common to North America, as outlined in a report by FrameWorks Institute:
While some of these narratives might seem harmless, ultimately, they remove responsibility from society by placing the blame on the individual, or by implying there's nothing that can be done to change the status quo.
The context in which a person lives or grows up plays a crucial role in the opportunities they are presented in life. Individuals with low SES often have access to fewer resources and services due to lack of funding policies. Instead of placing the blame on the person for not having achieved something, bring attention to the context in which they live and how it has impacted them.
Similarly, when telling success stories, make sure to mention the obstacles and challenges the individual faced, and the types of supports necessary to overcome them.
Be careful about terms that have a negative connotation, group a large number of people together, or place the blame on the individual. Instead, focus on the individual's strengths and achievements, while acknowledging the challenges and obstacles they faced. Whenever possible, consult with the individual for their preferred language.
Avoid terms like "low-class" that imply one group is better than the other. Use neutral, non-judgmental language.
Language that depicts poverty as a desirable state, such as enjoying "the simple things in life" or living a "pure" life is also problematic. While these phrases may appear positive, they undermine concerns about poverty ultimately leading to inaction.
Whenever possible, focus on what people have rather than what they lack. For example, instead of "high-school dropouts", use "people who have completed 10th grade."
Problematic Language | More Inclusive Alternative | Explanation |
---|---|---|
low class poor poverty-stricken |
low socioeconomic status | Use neutral, person-first language instead of pejorative terms. |
disadvantaged; underprivileged |
underserved; under-resourced | Avoid language that implies groups with a higher SES are superior. Alternatives such as "underserved" and "under-resourced" focus on systems and supports. |
minority | marginalized population | The term "minority" is not accurate, as people who belong to groups described as "minority" are actually not a numerical minority. For more information, refer to the section on racialized communities. |
the homeless |
people who are experiencing homelessness; people in transitional housing; people in emergency shelter |
Terms such as "the homeless" have a negative connotation. The alternatives presented here are more specific and focus on the quality or lack of housing. |
the ghetto, the inner city, the projects | [Use specific SES terms] | These terms have a negative connotation, socioeconomic status with race, and perpetuate racial stereotypes. Use specific, separate terms to describe race, SES and geographical location. |
Sources